Given an integer array nums
, return the sum of all XOR totals for every subset of nums
. The XOR total of an array is defined as the bitwise XOR of all its elements, and the XOR total of the empty subset is 0.
nums
?nums
?We need to consider all subsets of the array nums
and calculate the XOR for each subset. The sum of these XOR values will be our answer.
Generate Subsets:
We’ll use the power set approach to generate all subsets of nums
. Each element can either be in a subset or not, leading to 2^n
subsets for an array of length n
.
XOR Calculation: For each subset, calculate the XOR of its elements.
Sum the XOR Values: Sum all the XOR values obtained for each subset.
To efficiently generate subsets and handle XOR calculations, we can use backtracking.
def subsetXORSum(nums):
def backtrack(start, current_xor):
nonlocal total_sum
total_sum += current_xor
for i in range(start, len(nums)):
backtrack(i + 1, current_xor ^ nums[i])
total_sum = 0
backtrack(0, 0)
return total_sum
# Example usage:
nums = [1, 3]
print(subsetXORSum(nums)) # Output: 6
start
: Index to start from for generating subsets.current_xor
: Current XOR value of the subset being generated.current_xor
to the total_sum
.start
index to the length of nums
.nums[i]
and recursively call backtrack
.total_sum
to 0.current_xor
as 0.The algorithm’s complexity can be broken down as follows:
2^n
subsets for an array of length n
.O(n)
time to calculate the XOR.So, the worst-case time complexity is O(n * 2^n)
.
This approach is efficient for small to moderately sized arrays but may become infeasible for large n
due to the exponential growth of subsets.
This solution efficiently generates all possible subsets and calculates the XOR sum needed while maintaining manageable complexity for reasonable input sizes.
Got blindsided by a question you didn’t expect?
Spend too much time studying?
Or simply don’t have the time to go over all 3000 questions?